By Calvin Palmer
Facebook, Twitter, MySpace and other social networking Web sites shorten the attention span of children, encourage instant gratification and make them more self-centered.
These claims are made by Baroness Greenfield, a member of Britain’s House of Lords and a neuroscientist at Oxford University.
She believes repeated exposure to these Web sites could effectively ‘rewire’ the brain along with computer games and fast-paced TV shows.
“My fear is that these technologies are infantilising the brain into the state of small children who are attracted by buzzing noises and bright lights, who have a small attention span and who live for the moment,” she said.
Her comments echoed those she made during a House of Lords debate earlier this month. Then she argued that exposure to computer games, instant messaging, chat rooms and social networking sites could leave a generation with poor attention spans.
“I often wonder whether real conversation in real time may eventually give way to these sanitised and easier screen dialogues, in much the same way as killing, skinning and butchering an animal to eat has been replaced by the convenience of packages of meat on the supermarket shelf,” she said.
Lady Greenfield told the House of Lords a teacher of 30 years had told her she had noticed a sharp decline in the ability of her pupils to understand others.
“It is hard to see how living this way on a daily basis will not result in brains, or rather minds, different from those of previous generations,” she said.
She also suggests that the current increase in autism may be linked to an increased prevalence among people spending time in screen relationships.
Psychologists have argued that digital technology is changing the way we think. Students no longer need to plan essays before starting to write, they can edit as they go along thanks to word processors. Satellite navigation systems have negated the need to decipher maps. Well that’s a bonus for most women then.
A study by the Broadcaster Audience Research Board found teenagers now spend seven-and-a-half hours a day in front of a screen. Oh horror upon horror. I would have thought that was better than hanging round on street corners and stabbing someone.
Educational psychologist Jane Healy believes children should be kept away from computer games until they are seven. Most games only trigger the ‘flight or fight’ region of the brain, rather than the vital areas responsible for reasoning.
I take it Healy is not a great fan of computer games. I am surprised she has not launched into a tirade against Grand Theft Auto, the usual target when computer games come up for discussion.
Sue Palmer, no relation by the way, author of Toxic Childhood, said: ‘We are seeing children’s brain development damaged because they don’t engage in the activity they have engaged in for millennia.
“I’m not against technology and computers. But before they start social networking, they need to learn to make real relationships with people.”
Basically, what we have here is the widespread adoption of a new technology by young people being blamed by the old guard for all the perceived ills of youth culture.
I can remember back in the early 1960s how scientists would trot out their theories that watching too much television would harm children’s eyesight and probably rewire their brains for good measure.
The same thing was probably said when books became universal.
“It’s going to kill conversation and the oral tradition of story-telling,” experts of the day probably warned.
“It’s going to change the way we think, rewire children’s brains into constructing grammatically correct sentences and spelling words correctly. It’s the end of social interaction as we know it.”
The onset of moving pictures probably elicited similar protestations and dire warnings.
And yet look where we are, a world of fast communications, with music, video, photographs even family and friends just a key stroke away on a computer keyboard.
Would we want it any different? I think not.
And if children need to make relationships with real people before embarking upon a life of social networking, surely that is down to their parents. And that could well be the nub of the problem, not the advances in technology.
With the pressures of modern living, parents have not got the time to spend with their children like they used to have in the past, those millenia my namesake referred to, and it is far easier for parents to leave children to their own devices – computers, cell phones, playstations and televisions – rather than spend time with them.
So forget all this nonsense peddled by neuroscientists, psychologists or whoever wishes to sell a few more books or garner the media spotlight. Technology is here to stay and as new technologies develop, there will always be those doom-mongers among us to point out the dire consequences that could unfold with their use.
[Based on a report by the Daily Mail.]