By Calvin Palmer
Put some straw sticking out from Bobby Jindal’s collar and stick a floppy hat on his head and what have you got? The Scarecrow from The Wizard of Oz.
Now, what’s that song The Scarecrow sings? Ah yes, If I Only Had A Brain.
Rhodes scholar he may well be but the song personifies Jindal perfectly after his disastrous response to President Obama’s speech to the joint session of Congress on Tuesday night.
Having seen the back of the Wicked Witch of Wasilla, Sarah Palin — strange how she was not chosen to give the GOP’s response – I had hoped the Republican Party would have someone to rescue its credibility with the American people. I am talking about all Americans, not the Wicked Witch’s “real Americans”.
I had heard good things about Jindal. One of my relatives on my wife’s side lives in Louisiana and she has been impressed by him since he became governor of that state. He was portrayed to me as being young and dynamic, and his youth led me to believe that he wouldn’t subscribe to some of the GOP’s sacred cows that cost them the presidential election in November 2008.
How wrong I was. And my thoughts seem to be shared by a great many of the great and the good in America’s political scene. Of course, Rush Limbaugh is an exception but then he is neither great nor good.
“Insane.” “Childish.” Disaster.” Those were some of the kinder comments from political pundits about Jindal’s response.
His criticism of government spending for emergency economic relief has been widely panned, especially given his state’s receipt of billions in federal assistance after Hurricane Katrina in 2005.
And Jindal’s voice and earnest awkward delivery have drawn comparisons to Kenneth Parcell, the geeky page on the NBC comedy 30 Rock.
A new Facebook group titled Bobby Jindal is Kenneth the Page had already attracted more than 1,800 members by yesterday afternoon.
Jindal spoke from the governor’s mansion in Baton Rouge, and critics pounced on his remarks almost immediately, panning everything from his overly folksy demeanor to his complaint that Obama’s plan to revive the economy was “irresponsible”.
David Brooks, a conservative New York Times columnist who has criticized aspects of the stimulus plan, nonetheless called Jindal’s arguments “insane” and “tone-deaf” given the dire economic challenges the country faces.
“To come up in this moment in history with a stale, ‘Government is the problem, you can’t trust the federal government’ is just a disaster for the Republican Party,” Brooks said on The NewsHour With Jim Lehrer on PBS. “It’s not where the country is, it’s not where the future of the country is.”
Fox News commentator Juan Williams focused on Jindal’s delivery.
“It came off as amateurish, and even the tempo in which he spoke was sing-songy,” Williams said, adding that the content of the speech was “very simplistic and almost childish.”
Penni Pier, a political communication specialist at Iowa’s Wartburg College, said Jindal’s presentation was overly colloquial and his message of less government and more tax cuts was substantively thin.
“It sounded like the same old rhetoric — we had tax cuts the last eight years, and look where it got us,” Pier said. “Jindal was also trying to be so familiar, he lost credibility. Obama is familiar, but at the same time always a statesman.”
Rush Limbaugh defended Jindal on his radio show yesterday, while conceding that Obama had “stylistically” outshined Jindal.
“The people on our side are making a real mistake if they go after Bobby Jindal,” Limbaugh said. “We cannot shun politicians who speak for our beliefs just because we don’t like the way he says it.”
Who is “we” Rush? You and the mouse in your pocket? And what is this nonsense about “sides”? The issue at stake here is America. Usually, when a nation is facing a catastrophic crisis, party politics are put to one side until the crisis has been resolved. America, in case you had not realized, is bigger than any one political faction.
Jindal said that the solution to America’s problems lies in not raising taxes and not putting more money and power in the hands of Washington politicians. He argued the way to lead is by empowering the American people.
His way of getting out of the financial crisis and accompanying recession is to strengthen incentives for businesses to invest in new equipment and hire new workers.
But if the banks are not lending, indeed if many of the banks had ceased to exist, a likely scenario without the bailout package, where would businesses get the money to invest in new equipment and hire new workers?
Does he imagine CEOs will stump up the cash from their offshore bank accounts? Here’s hoping they did not invest their millions with Allen Stanford’s bank or his investment companies.
And if Jindal is so keen on empowering the people, why isn’t he revoking Louisiana’s stringent anti-smoking legislation, introduced under his Democratic predecessor?
If he is true to his political philosophy, shouldn’t he allow individual business owners to decide whether they make their premises smoking or non-smoking? Shouldn’t he be encouraging provisions for people who do enjoy tobacco to be allowed to do so, while at the same time making smoke-free provisions for those who do not?
Poor Bobby, if he only had a brain to think beyond the failed mantra of the Republican Party, to offer something fresh and exciting, a vision that would capture the imagination of the American people.
That is precisely what Obama offered the nation and look where it got him.
[Based on a report by the Associated Press.]